this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
1510 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2334 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Over three-fourths of Americans think there should be a maximum age limit for elected officials, according to a CBS News/YouGov survey.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think term limits would be 90% effective. That and fixing gerrymandered districts. How many of those old folks in the House have been cruising to easy reelection due to rigged voting districts? Limit the House to 5 terms and the Senate to 2 terms. That's a maximum of 22 years someone could be a federal elected politician excluding the presidency. That's more than enough time to leave their mark on the country.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Term limits, no gerrymandering, ranked choice voting, and more than two political parties.

[–] isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think no gerrymandering would absolutely nuke the red presence. Honestly looking at how bad the district maps are it's insane it's even gotten that far.

[–] Rivalarrival 4 points 1 year ago

The only way to eliminate gerrymandering is to eliminate geographically-defined congressional districts.

I think we should empanel our congressional delegation in statewide elections. I also think we shouldn't have 435 votes in the house. I think we should have one vote for each person in the country. I think each representative should cast one vote for each actual person they represent.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Term limits, no gerrymandering, ranked choice voting, and more than two political parties.

We already have more than two parties, its just almost nobody votes for them. With rank choice voting they'll be more visible than they are today.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Certainly, but they're not given the same slice as D and R. Laws should help balance the scales.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem with no gerrymandering is that it’s actively hard to enforce without false positives

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everything is hard if you're trying to do it right, especially large scale. Babies with crayons draw better maps than what happened/is happening in Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, etc.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah no there does absolutely need to be a criminal threshold and Ohio and Florida are past it. At the bare minimum it needs to cost you your seat if you pull the shit ohio keeps pulling.

As an Ohioan at no point has my vote for representatives ever mattered even when it should. It’s not like nyc or something, fucking Cincinnati shouldn’t be 3 red seats.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think term limits on the presidency meant that Trump ran against Clinton instead of Obama.

Obama was more popular than Clinton.

[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Hillary, Why pick her over anyone else when her stigma was so intensely negitive? Isnt their goal to get their person in that chair via the election.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's okay and that's the democracy we chose.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would have rather had a third term of Obama than what we got with Trump, and I think term limits for the presidency were a shortsighted mistake.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I... appreciate that sentiment, but I also fear how history has taught us long terms can lead to leader who... don't wanna leave. Of course that didn't stop trump from trying.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Of course that didn’t stop trump from trying.

And he had the same term limits as anyone else since 1951. Who fought the peaceful transition of power prior to 1951?