this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
102 points (100.0% liked)
Public Health
646 readers
140 users here now
For issues concerning:
- Public Health
- Global Health
- Health Systems & Policy
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- etc.
π©Ί This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.
Related Communities
- Medical Community Hub
- Medicine
- Medicine Canada
- Premed
- Premed Canada
- Public Health (π)
See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)
Rules
Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.
Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content
Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In rats and petri dishes. Not saying that's not enough to be cautious or even ban it, but far from conclusive
no reason not to restrict something thats only used for cosmetics and may be potentially harmful
Still, it identified one very specific mechanism/interaction with the mice brain composition. That alone warrants a lot of caution, but I'm no expert.
The EU goes with the principle of precaution. The idea being that if something looks like it might be toxic, it's probably best to remove it from the market.
Apparently in the US you first have to prove that it has decimated several families.
Unless it's guns of course
Dont say that. Ask about roundup/bayer, they think being a massive cancer rise for decades was fine. Just all those weak people that actually got cancer that made it an issue. /s
The USA were pretty fine with it, until Monsanto was bought by a foreign company.
It kind of makes sense at the scale of hundreds of millions of people, because:
Something this common will have measurable effects, making it easy to prove in theory.
There are many cases in the past of people lobbying to ban anything used by their competitors, such as Sassafras being banned in the cola wars which is still illegal to this day.
Admittedly, haven't read it yet π
Fair enough, but that still technically only tells you something about the effect it has on the murine brain, not necessarily the human one
Why are you dissenting without reading the underlying?
Any objection or opinion you might have is entirely discredited.