this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
444 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1858 readers
492 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

why is no-one demanding to know why the robot is so sexay

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry for being late, busy wanking off to the sexy robot in the article. So ye, anyway, why'd you do that?

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

to get you into ahem vibe coding

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 21 hours ago

ChatGPT, please tailor my resume and write me a cover letter for all programming positions at teledildonics companies, thanks!

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

ah I do believe I have the link for this

example mvp: hook up your linter/LSP/CI-errors-output to buttplug

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 1 day ago

Hi hi please explain my boner

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know what this has to do with this thread, but maybe ask Hajime Sorayama, he kind of came up with the whole concept of sexy robots.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago

Quantity has a quality all its own

Boom steelmanned

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

not super into cyber facehugger tbh

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago

as long as you don’t yuck my yum we good

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago

but look how delighted they are!