this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
102 points (97.2% liked)

traingang

22834 readers
3 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Give me double toilets mate, couples that shit together, stay together

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huf@hexbear.net 26 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

why do they put their toilets in their bathrooms? i understand why people with small houses/apartments do it, but why not have a separate toilet room if you have a 9200 square foot house anyway?

they're weird.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Well, I do prefer to wash my hands after cleaning myself and before touching 2 door handles, so I get that one.

[–] AntifaSuperWombat@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I’ve never seen a toilet that didn’t have at least a small sink in there.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

oh so the prorposal was a bathroom with no toilet (so sink and shower/bath), and a toilet separate from that room that also has a small washing station or something. yeah that could work

[–] AntifaSuperWombat@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, especially if you have multiple people living there.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But then why not add a bath too, to that toilet room? If youre already rich?

[–] AntifaSuperWombat@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The point of a bathroom is to clean yourself. It kinda defeats that purpose when you have an object slinging around poop particles everywhere in the same room.

So if you’re that rich, you would have a seperate toilet and bathroom for each person. (And of course a poor housekeeper that has to clean all of them).

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I just put the lid down though, then your poop stays in. I hope...

[–] AntifaSuperWombat@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I admire your optimism, but well... distress

only click if you’re brave enough

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

Oh shit oh fuck

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's very normal here (Australia)

[–] huf@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

ideally you'd have a small sink in it too, yes

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've been in houses where toilets were in small closets with nothing else. I didn't like touching the doorknobs.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeh same, most of my life I've lived in houses where the toilet was separate from the sink, so you had to open at least one door on the way. There are some really cool Japanese toilets I've seen where there's a small handbasin above the cistern that runs after each flush. Seemed very efficient

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

If the basin is tiny I would splash lots of water everywhere

[–] AntifaSuperWombat@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Has to be a fetish. There’s no other reasonable explanation.

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Everything I don't understand is a fetish, a disturbingly accurate guide to life"

[–] AntifaSuperWombat@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ok granted, but double toilets without any separation would 100% be a fetish thing. You can’t tell me otherwise.

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wasn't disagreeing with you

[–] AntifaSuperWombat@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well, you should have. Because now I’m a bit scared about what you’re implying. scared