this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
786 points (96.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

39635 readers
313 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In password security, the longer the better. With a password manager, using more than 24 characters is simple. Unless, of course, the secure password is not accepted due to its length. (In this case, through STOVE.)

Possibly indicating cleartext storage of a limited field (which is an absolute no-go), or suboptimal or lacking security practices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Your password MUST contain big and small letters, and contain at least 1 number character and 1 spacial character, it MUST be 8 characters long, and it MUST be typed on a German Cherry keyboard between 8-9 PM, using ONLY 1 finger while blindfolded and listening to ABBA music. BUT NO SPACES ALLOWED!!!
This is because of something called entropy we never even read about so we have zero understanding of it. Of course combined with lousy programming, so safety is all on you.

Making all these possibilities OPTIONAL would actually make for safer passwords (higher entropy), as would using multiple words separated by spaces. The only meaningful way to accept a password would be to test it against common bad passwords, and test the entropy to determine acceptable levels. There is no good reason a password couldn't be 10 words and at least 127 characters. There is no way that should stress a properly designed modern system.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You have described all of the guidelines that NIST, Microsoft, GCHQ and a few other institutions now recommend for password security.

And yet I still have to have this argument with so-called security engineers and my favourite, compliance officers.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

the guidelines that NIST, Microsoft, GCHQ and a few other institutions now recommend for password security

Because they are morons that don't understand entropy.
Requiring at least 1 number increases entropy less than simply allowing the use of numbers, and then recommending it.
But most password queries are lousy at describing what's allowed when creating it, and they generally don't describe it at all when you enter it for access.
The second part can be crucial for remembering exactly how the password was created, because what is now required, used to often not even be possible to use!

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

you forgot that you can only use a selection of special characters from a pre approved list of 10.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 12 points 1 day ago

Had that yesterday.

"Must use special characters!"

"Okay, no problem. Here you go."

"Not that one! It's too special!"

"Dude, I haven't even touched extended ASCII yet."

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago

A pre-approved list of 10 which THEY DON'T EVEN TELL YOU WHAT THEY ARE

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

genuinely, whats up with not being able to use spaces?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I think it's originally because of bad programming. It's so incredibly stupid I don't have words.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love when there are so many rules that my first few randomly-generated passwords are rejected.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Even worse, when you can’t figure out why, or how to configure the generator, then end up having to type your own anyway

I like the ones that just tell you your password strength.

Subtle shaming of bad passwords without giving bad actors hints as to what the minimum (and thus most likely) password is.