this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
675 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

12665 readers
2229 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As it turns out it doesn't actually cost that much on regular transit, there's an AIRPORT SURCHARGE because it's an "airport train".

No wonder Americans don't use public transit, even when the system exists it's ridiculously difficult and expensive to use.

Source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (10 children)

May I ask how car is 10 minutes and bike 53? And walk over 2 hours? I ride the electric bike to work and it's about 10 minutes ride, vs 4 minutes by car, so roughly double. 20 minute walk, not brisk. It's hot here too, that's part of why I got the electronic bike, walking was making me arrive sweaty.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

70 MPH via car, vs… What, like 15 MPH on a bike? Also, there’s no way I’m riding my bike on a 70 MPH highway; I’d have to take a different (much longer) route entirely, just to avoid getting killed by a truck.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

so you live next to a highway ramp and your work is also next to a highway ramp? also what the fuck 112 km/h is extremely fast, i don't think any road in sweden goes that fast.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

(another user) I live in Spain, in a city where most of the region come to work. We have the vet in a nearby town, so we usually go there by car. Getting out of the city into the town takes around 15 minutes, of which around 10 are spent on a 120KMH highway. Bikes can't go on that road, completely banned, so they would need to go through another, way longer route. Yeah, it would take over an hour to go on a bike.

The people that live in that town that come to my city to work basically need a car, and it's not like they can't do their living in walking distance for every necessity but work. It is what it is.

also what the fuck 112 km/h is extremely fast

120KMH is the max here, but it's pretty common for highways to have that cap. Same for france iirc (130?) and germany, besides their funny uncapped road. In fact, sweden has very similar limits, where "motorways" go around 110 to 120. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_limits_in_Sweden

I'm surprised you don't know this, do you have a license?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)