this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23022 readers
185 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Been seeing more and more evidence that mass literacy is both massively diminished compared to the 20th century and accelerating in its decline across the world, especially in relatively highly educated countries. This problem is obviously much more severe amongst the working class than others, as historically tends to be the case.

If we want the masses to get to grips with a communist understanding of the world, which requires a lot of reading and discussion of text, surely this is an issue we need to grapple with. Current political education initiatives usually bring together smaller, highly-literate (typically university educated) groups of people, which tend to remain insular and rarely seem to engage with the broader working class. I am convinced that a significant barrier to mass political education is that so many "literate" people are unable to read a simple paragraph.

How do we rectify this situation? It seems historically unique because in the past, illiterate people had no illusions about the fact that they couldn't read and were enthusiastic about learning (at least, in general). Nowadays, I can imagine that most people would not view their literacy as something that needs to be improved, and many will even react with hostility to such a suggestion.

What's the correct approach? Do we need to emphasise the practical rewards that those who engage with theoretical texts benefit from? Take a direct approach and offer reading comprehension sessions? Interested to hear what others think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It has nothing to do with theory ,do you think we people who come from the global south became Marxists because we read Marx ? Don’t get me wrong we learned from him of course and many people in the global south have read him (the co founder of Islamic jihad allegedly did) but more than theory ,it’s our lived experience ,literacy has absolutely nothing to do with it ANYMORE ,certainly not in “developed” countries ,some of the biggest supporters of communism were peasants and came/come from the peasantry

There is no reason to use big words ,liberals make fun of trump for this but his limited vocabulary in his speeches clearly connects with his followers and it works

Yes you should explain stuff like the falling rate of profit but you shouldn’t quote Marx directly ,you should use words an 8 year old kid would understand

The problem in the west is literacy comprehension ,you don’t control the system so you can’t fix it right now

What you can do it get around it by saying the stuff the miseducated people understand