Place |
Team |
Points |
#1 Votes |
Movement |
Noisy |
1 |
Georgia |
191 |
6 |
- |
Georgia |
2 |
Michigan |
189 |
0 |
- |
Michigan |
3 |
Texas |
180 |
1 |
+6 |
Ohio State |
4 |
Florida State |
177 |
0 |
+1 |
Texas |
5 |
Ohio State |
163 |
0 |
-2 |
Florida State |
6 |
Penn State |
148 |
0 |
- |
Penn State |
7 |
Washington |
139 |
0 |
+1 |
Washington |
8 |
USC |
138 |
1 |
+4 |
USC |
9 |
Notre Dame |
135 |
0 |
+4 |
Notre Dame |
10 |
Alabama |
121 |
0 |
-6 |
Alabama |
11 |
Tennessee |
121 |
0 |
-4 |
Tennessee |
12 |
Utah |
116 |
0 |
-2 |
Utah |
13 |
Oregon |
108 |
0 |
-2 |
Oregon |
14 |
Ole Miss |
80 |
0 |
+4 |
Kansas State |
15 |
Oklahoma |
77 |
0 |
+1 |
Ole Miss |
16 |
Kansas State |
72 |
0 |
+1 |
Oklahoma |
17 |
LSU |
65 |
0 |
-3 |
LSU |
18 |
North Carolina |
63 |
0 |
-3 |
North Carolina |
19 |
Oregon State |
50 |
0 |
+2 |
Oregon State |
20 |
Miami (FL) |
43 |
0 |
NR |
Miami (FL) |
21 |
Colorado |
38 |
0 |
+2 |
Colorado |
22 |
Duke |
37 |
0 |
- |
Duke |
23 |
Washington State |
21 |
0 |
NR |
Louisville |
24 |
Arkansas |
17 |
0 |
NR |
Troy |
25 |
Iowa |
17 |
0 |
NR |
Baylor |
Others receiving votes: Wisconsin (15), Texas A&M (14), UCLA (14), Auburn (10), Louisville (10), Wake Forest (10), Kentucky (8), Kansas (5), Rutgers (4), Clemson (3), Tulane (1)
Link to check out the spreadsheet of responses here
As always a few notes:
I want to be as hands off this data as possible, but it just didn't sit right ranking Troy and Baylor because of the strangest ballot I've ever seen. And it just raises so many questions in my mind. Who are you? Do you actually think Troy has a good football team? Were you that drunk that you don't even know? Were you a traveler who just thought they would participate in this small community but doesn't know football? Are you a buckeye that was trying to subtly boost tOSU's points? Are you doing a bit? Were you doing this specifically to fuck with me? Because it worked. I haven't been sleeping since I saw this. But whoever you are if you have a legit system that gave you these rankings let me know and I'll rework the table. The results tab on the spreadsheet shared in the post will keep that entry but the table above was scored without that entry.
And to who it may concern:
I like how they got lazy in the second half of their ballot and just filled in teams at the beginning of the alphabet. The attention span for that troll job was really short.
I guess it could also be an early season computer poll, but I don't understand submitting one this early if it looks like that.
To whomever submitted that ballot...u wot m8?
So then we do a secondary poll to decide who wins the tiebreakers!
Haha just kidding~..unless..?~