MeanwhileOnGrad
"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"
Welcome to MoG!
Meanwhile On Grad
Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!
What is a Tankie?
Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.
(caution of biased source)
Basic Rules:
Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.
Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.
Apologia — (Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.
Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.
Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.
Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.
You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.
view the rest of the comments
The alternate to the less popular rule 2 that encompasses banning anything remotely critical of any of their favorite dictators.
Yeah, months ago I posted an article from a Chinese research group, in a Chinese university, published by the CCP, about how 1 billion people live on less than 340 dollars a month, which, by Chinese standards, is poverty, and most of the rest of the population wasn't making much more. This didn't get me banned, but they deleted the post, under rule 2. Oops 1billion people were actually not pulled out of poverty according to China's own financial research.
Within a week of the article started hitting western news sources it all but vanished, in normal media, very suddenly, as the CCP suppressed it. So apple, and tree.
China's "no more poverty" claim is based on the UN global standard, which was then $3-per-person-per-day, thus $90-per-month. That standard was recently updated and for upper-middle–income countries it is now $8.40-per-day, thus $252-per-month, so their statement is still accurate. Whether using a global poverty threshold for a BRICS country makes sense is your decision.
Yeah, we should definitely use China's own standard for that metric, doesn't make sense to call something not poverty in a place that still considers it to be poverty, themselves.
As for .ml, why not make this claim and leave it, rather than delete? Eh, well... don't really care, I am here to laugh.
That must have happened with an alt account, because it wasn’t this one: https://sh.itjust.works/modlog?actionType=All&userId=16390800
This is a newsweek article that talks about the article that was scrubbed. It's newsweek, but they give all the information about the article. I can only find articles about it being scrubbed as apposed to the article I originally read. If you are interested in what I am talking about.
https://www.newsweek.com/china-article-censorship-1-billion-people-monthly-income-2000-yuan-poverty-1856031
It was, and one created from a different instance too