Place |
Team |
Points |
#1 Votes |
Movement |
Noisy |
1 |
Georgia |
191 |
6 |
- |
Georgia |
2 |
Michigan |
189 |
0 |
- |
Michigan |
3 |
Texas |
180 |
1 |
+6 |
Ohio State |
4 |
Florida State |
177 |
0 |
+1 |
Texas |
5 |
Ohio State |
163 |
0 |
-2 |
Florida State |
6 |
Penn State |
148 |
0 |
- |
Penn State |
7 |
Washington |
139 |
0 |
+1 |
Washington |
8 |
USC |
138 |
1 |
+4 |
USC |
9 |
Notre Dame |
135 |
0 |
+4 |
Notre Dame |
10 |
Alabama |
121 |
0 |
-6 |
Alabama |
11 |
Tennessee |
121 |
0 |
-4 |
Tennessee |
12 |
Utah |
116 |
0 |
-2 |
Utah |
13 |
Oregon |
108 |
0 |
-2 |
Oregon |
14 |
Ole Miss |
80 |
0 |
+4 |
Kansas State |
15 |
Oklahoma |
77 |
0 |
+1 |
Ole Miss |
16 |
Kansas State |
72 |
0 |
+1 |
Oklahoma |
17 |
LSU |
65 |
0 |
-3 |
LSU |
18 |
North Carolina |
63 |
0 |
-3 |
North Carolina |
19 |
Oregon State |
50 |
0 |
+2 |
Oregon State |
20 |
Miami (FL) |
43 |
0 |
NR |
Miami (FL) |
21 |
Colorado |
38 |
0 |
+2 |
Colorado |
22 |
Duke |
37 |
0 |
- |
Duke |
23 |
Washington State |
21 |
0 |
NR |
Louisville |
24 |
Arkansas |
17 |
0 |
NR |
Troy |
25 |
Iowa |
17 |
0 |
NR |
Baylor |
Others receiving votes: Wisconsin (15), Texas A&M (14), UCLA (14), Auburn (10), Louisville (10), Wake Forest (10), Kentucky (8), Kansas (5), Rutgers (4), Clemson (3), Tulane (1)
Link to check out the spreadsheet of responses here
I'm okay with ties (but I'm also a weirdo who thinks games should be able to tie and is okay with split national champions). IIRC, r/cfb had the occasional tie and split the #10 spot in half -- but they had tons of voters so that was rare. I think if we get to, say, 20ish regular voters then I would suggest allowing them.
Kind of bummed we already seem to have gotten a throwaway ballot, and surprised it wouldn't have messed up the poll too much given our small sample size (although it would have made a mess of "others receiving votes"). If they really wanted to manipulate the poll, they could have been more crafty about it and then we would have had to keep it. I think you made the right call here, but we should probably set up some guidelines for throwing out ballots. I don't know if it would be too much work, but if they are missing more than, say, 5 teams on the otherwise final rankings then I would say it should be thrown out. The criteria could be looser than that if only a few games were played (and in the preseason I like it being a free-for-all).