this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
938 points (96.4% liked)

Greentext

6427 readers
1789 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The real question is whether the collapse of his house of cards will lead to a 99.7% loss of wealth or >100% loss. He won't be a billionaire anymore if it's the latter.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

He could declare bankruptcy and be a billionaire again tomorrow.

And I don't say this out of any kind of admiration for him; just there's still enough moneyed rubes out there that he could set up a new company making plumbuses and it would hit unicorn status by the end of the day.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, he probably will. I know I'd be surprised if he didn't have money squirreled away somewhere.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

I'd also be surprised if no one goes after him for trying to run away from debts. If we know anything, it's that most laws only apply when they benefit the rich, and he'll be making a lot of rich people angry if it turns out he did have extra money squirreled away.