this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
46 points (92.6% liked)

AI

4978 readers
99 users here now

Artificial intelligence (AI) is intelligence demonstrated by machines, unlike the natural intelligence displayed by humans and animals, which involves consciousness and emotionality. The distinction between the former and the latter categories is often revealed by the acronym chosen.

founded 4 years ago
 

Title, or at least the inverse be encouraged. This has been talked about before, but with how bad things are getting, and how realistic goods ai generated videos are getting, anything feels better than nothing, AI generated watermarks, or metadata can be removed, but thats not the point, the point is deterrence. Immediately all big tech will comply (atleast on the surface for consumer-facing products), and then we will probably see a massive decrease in malicious use of it, people will bypass it, remove watermarks, fix metadata, but the situation should be quite a bit better? I dont see many downsides/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jjmoldy@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How would such a law be enforced? What agency would enforce it? What penalty would one face for breaking this law?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Force the AI models to contain some kind of metadata in all their material. Training AI models is a massive undertaking, it's not like they can hide what they're doing. We know who is training these models and where their data centers are, so a regulatory agency would certainly be able to force them to comply.

In the US this could be done with the FCC, in other countries the power can be invested into regulatory bodies that control communications and broadcasting etc.

The penalty? Break them on the fucking wheel.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

yes, the ones you pay for and are the publicly scrutinized might. Privately trained models just, you know, won't

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 minutes ago

If they can find cannabis grow ops from power usage, they certainly can find people using massive amounts of data and processing power and public water and investor cash to train AI. You expect me to believe this could be done in secret?

[–] jjmoldy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Medieval torture in response to what is essentially copyright infringement. Very sane!

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Or just nationalize their companies I guess.

[–] jjmoldy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Well that's certainly less extreme than breaking on the wheel, I'll give you that, but it doesn't seem very realistic in most countries, where nationalization is rare and done mainly for strategic purposes.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Well the most realistic thing is that there will be no regulations or if there are regulations they're toothless fines or something.

I didn't realize we were limiting ourselves to our backwards political system where the rich and powerful write their own regulations.

Nothing will be done, realistically.

Nothing is ever done about anything.

[–] jjmoldy@lemmy.world -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I gather from your username that you consider yourself a communist? How do you suppose your ambitions could be put into reality when the movement is so devastatingly weak and disorganized?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Things only look that way when you're a Western Marxist and reject actually existing socialism around the world. China is hardly weak or disorganized.

Or do you mean AI regulation? I think it's probably best to just focus on AI being used for war and struggle against that (No Tech For Apartheid comes to mind), rather than try and tackle all AI everywhere all at once.

[–] jjmoldy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

To be clear I am not a socialist or communist, Western or otherwise. Yes, China is ascendent on the world stage and likely will continue to be, but they have shown no willingness to aid communist movements abroad. That can change of course but it would seem to me that the CPC is more concerned with maintaining international relationships and economic agreements than fomenting the global revolution. I also somewhat doubt the party's commitment to eventually 'withering away' as Marx put it. To be fair, I know that couldn't happen unless the whole world was on board or they'd get promptly steamrolled by one adversary or another.