this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
866 points (92.0% liked)

memes

15405 readers
3700 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not about taking it seriously. The meme wants to be a technically correct-meme, where a thing fulfills another things definition and thereby could be deemed the other thing - which creates the absurdity the meme lives off of. But in order for that kind of humour, there cannot be obvious holes in the logic of the joke and these obvious holes are very present in this meme.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago

Any maths joke of this type will have obvious holes in it, that's just how maths works

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well the text in the image of the "definition" of a square is clearly tailored to fit this joke, thats why the logic of what a square actually is doesn't apply. Its like telling Diogenes that his chicken is not technically a human because it doesn't have two hands and a nose.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Diogenes plucked that chicken to point out Platon's definition of a human (being a bipedal, featherless animal) being flawed. This meme leaves out parts of the definition to enforce a joke. Two different situations.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its similar enough, the definition is limited and therefore enables a joke to be made.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not similar, it's the exact opposite.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 0 points 1 day ago

It still demonstrated what I was trying to say, that if you go too literal on these two jokes then you're missing the point