this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
34 points (94.7% liked)
Comics
472 readers
31 users here now
Your comm for all things comic book! From Golden Age classics to webcomics, welcome.
General site-wide rules apply.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’m not saying they conflict, I’m saying they are separate things, both laudable.
How to treat content with racist undertones (or overtones) is certainly worthy of debate; I tend to agree that not hiding them, but rather to used them to educate, as they’ve done heretofore, is probably the best. But even if the decision is to hide them, I don’t think it falls under the DEI bucket, at least not directly.
And I'm saying they're not separate, because if you publish "the turner diaries" for a broad public audience (I could see an exception for very hyper specialised academic presses and orgs of that nature), you aren't providing a welcoming environment to potential black colleagues, even if you put a disclaimer at the front. No form of bigotry is compatible with DEI for that reason. I just don't think that we need to keep publishing racist Donald duck comics to teach about racism any more than America needs to keep statues of Columbus to teach the evils of colonialism, so the continued publication of those comics is unjustified and therefore hostile to PoC. Which is in direct conflict with DEI.