this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
62 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1968 readers
1008 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HedyL@awful.systems 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No, but it does mean that little girls no longer learn to write greeting cards to their grandmothers in beautiful feminine handwriting. It's important to note that I was part of Generation X and, due to innate clumsiness (and being left-handed), I didn't have pretty handwriting even before computers became the norm. But I was berated a lot for that, and computers supposedly made everything worse. It was a bit of a moral panic.

But I admit that this is not comparable to chatbots.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

… what.

This article is about a scientific study that shows clear differences in brain activity between people who used LLMs and those who didn't. If you can't tell the difference between that and whatever the hell you're going on about, you might want to cut down on the LLM usage.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe do some self reflection first? You're missing their point and it's bigger than Saturn.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Maybe explain to me how people baselessly criticising technology (like typewriters for example) for making people dumber is the same as a scientific study showing differences in EEG activity?

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 9 points 8 hours ago

It's not. Read again.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 13 points 9 hours ago

Or you could read the entirety of the first comment in this thread and see how it was not saying that. Notice the part that begins, "However, I believe there is an important difference to chatbots..."

[–] HedyL@awful.systems 9 points 9 hours ago

LOL - you might not want to believe that, but there is nothing to cut down. I actively steer clear of LLMs because I find them repulsive (being so confidently wrong almost all the time).

Nevertheless, there will probably be some people who claim that thanks to LLMs we no longer need the skills for language processing, working memory, or creative writing, because LLMs can do all of this much better than humans (just like calculators can calculate a square root faster). I think that's bullshit, because LLMs just aren't capable of doing any of these things in a meaningful way.