this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
444 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2847 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The effects from about 250 years of industrialization sure did compound, huh?

So we'll compound more and be right on track in what, 300-350 years?

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Industrial revolution was not global, renewables are

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If industrialization wasn't global surely the effects of it weren't global either 🤡

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Upgrade your reading comprehension 🤡

Where did the industrial revolution start?

It was not global from 1760 to 1820 ya jabroni

Renewables are being implemented in a far wider geographic than the Industrial Revolution was is my point

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My point is the implications of the industrial revolution don't stop at national borders.

You don't need every country to emit pollution when they all share the same atmosphere.

And it's overwhelmingly likely that the rollout of renewables and environmentally responsible infrastructure won't happen everywhere at once. It begins in the countries with the ability and materials to produce such systems.

Do you have a map of existing renewable use per capital to see if my opinion is accurate or are you just going to be a massive prick?

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not my fault if you don't understand. Go read a book.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great talk, you've done wonders for the community.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Great talk, you've done wonders for the community.

You called me a massive prick dude. Don't dish it out if you can't take it back.

It's not that hard a concept. I even posted a picture. Do you really think technology is not being developed and implemented faster today than the 18th century?

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I think the incentive is incredibly asymmetrical.

Everyone wants a tractor to help them plow the field, not everyone wants to do carbon capture.

I'll go read that book now lol