this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
522 points (95.6% liked)

Antiwork

8297 readers
5 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Property developer and CEO Tim Gurner: "We need to see unemployment rise. Unemployment has to jump 40, 50 percent in my view. We need to see pain in the economy. We need to remind people that they work for the employer, not the other way around."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can find a article fomer cia agents talking about how they did it. They would det fields on fire, break important farm equipment stuff like thst.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was that enough to turn the country into a net importer? I thought the general mismanagement was the bigger problem.

[–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

General mismanagement? They went from a feudal dirt based monarchy to the first spacefairing civilization in a lifetime. Their management was far better than ours. We just had a head start and the power to do more evil.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet China managed to survive. Of course there are external factors but it's important to know which internal decisions could have led to success.

Processors, internet, renewable energy, etc. Maybe winning the space race prevented success in other areas?

[–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stalin should not have stopped till the sea. China is willing to do what it takes to win. They have cut deals with evil countries to get resources to allow them to become the next hegemony. The US might never have stayed on top for quite some time if China had not seized the means of production

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

The atomic bomb, Stalin had to stop.

But that suggests that capitalistic meddling brought the sovjet union down. The primary question should be how the sovjet union could have kept the lead.