this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
29 points (67.9% liked)

Rant

462 readers
2 users here now

A place where you can rant to your heart's content.

Rules :
  1. Follow all of Lemmy code of conduct.
  2. Be respectful to others, even if they're the subject of your rant. Realize that you can be angry at someone without denigrating them.
  3. Keep it on Topic. Memes about ranting are allowed for now, but will be banned if they start to become more prevalent than actual rants.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org
29
Just blocked hexbear (self.rant)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by LodeMike to c/rant@lemmy.sdf.org
178 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Its just an instance where tankies can exist in an echo chamber without having to critically think.

If you want you can read some of my comments here and watch these morons make fallacious argument after falacious argument, put words in my mouth, and project some person who makes similarly bad takes which exists inside their head onto me: https://lemmy.today/comment/17304484

Edit: there's also this thread: https://lemmy.today/post/32415724/17304693

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

I want you to take that admission of ignorance and keep going with it. Not to us, just admitting to yourself what you really do and don't know. Do you know what an Uygher looks like? What their language or culture are like? Where they live, inside and outside of china? What do you know about china more generally? What have you been told about China, and what do you actually know? What have you seen, what have you been told you've seen, and what haven't you seen?

I'm not telling you you have to believe China is a perfect utopia, I'm just telling you not to believe everything you hear or read about it. The West very publicly considers China and enemy, so every claim it makes about China should be met with scepticism. Have you read the sources provided for the claims made about it? Have you looked at the individuals and organisations that created those sources? You have to read the whole corpus of information to build the real picture.