unions

1631 readers

2 users here now

a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc

Friends:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

jackalope@lemmy.ml

613

The ten poorest states are all right to work states (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by cyu@sh.itjust.works to c/unions@lemmy.ml

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source: https://mstdn.ca/@ned/111064882466835001

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] neanderthal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I even question the usefulness at high levels. It doesn't measure how much wealth is produced. Say our GDP is 10 billion. Let's say 2 billion is tshirts that suck and get thrown away. Next year we make tshirts that last 5 years and our GDP is 11 billion because they cost more. Year 3, it shrinks to 9 billion because we don't have to make as many tshirts. We are better off in year 3 than year 1 by a billion, because we actually kept those shirts instead of tossing them.

I would like to see GDP numbers adjusted for useful production. E.g. since 40% of food is trashed, cut that portion of the GDP by 30% (we need some wiggle room so a bad crop doesn't cause a famine)

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I’m not an economist, as such I don’t understand all the nuances for gdp but it seems every time a dollar trades hands, it impacts the gdp.

The problem is a lot of its funny money.

We also base our budgets on gdp. As such it’s screwy as we spend like all of its being taxed.

Military is 3% gdp which doesn’t place us in the top 10 for spending. Yet on dollars we are the highest spender by far but we don’t collect enough to cover our debts.