this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
8 points (90.0% liked)
chat
8432 readers
86 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why shouldn't a comrade practice writing agitational stuff?
If most issues were solved 100 years ago, there wouldn't have been so much trouble 88 years ago or 70 years ago or 34 years ago. It's an evolving cause that should embrace the progression of science, especially when psychology and anthropology have come into their own as rigorous disciplines in the time since Marx and Lenin.
We Demand Tomorrow was a manifesto, and it was good. We'll always have a reason to concretize ideas and adapt them to the circumstances we're in.
A manifesto is a declaration of values, whether for an organization or an individual.
If an individual, then it is electoralism-brained, public preaching on the street corner to prove that one holds the most correct stances. Because in liberal democracy, your political power is reduced to mere enumeration of individual beliefs, rather than organized action. A manifesto of this kind centers the individual for little benefit to the broader working class, if any. The only time it might make sense to publish this kind of manifesto, then, is before some sort of adventurism which is ineffective and individualist for the same reasons.
If an organization, then a manifesto serves as a centralized place to declare the purpose of their concrete activism, as a means of recruitment.
I would assume it would be written with the intent of building up an organization around it.
Are you going to say that our present organizations are perfect, and that we don't need to develop them any further?
Has any effective organization ever began with an individual publishing a manifesto?
If your org is wrong on an issue, you are obligated to critique them. Not doing so is one of the types of liberalism. But I wouldn’t call such a critique a manifesto. It would be an essay. It would have a relatively narrow scope on whatever issue you disagree on.
If you disagree with everything your org is doing, then just leave it.