this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
461 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

15590 readers
840 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shapis@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago (9 children)

This very nice Romanian lady that taught me complex plane calculus made sure to emphasize that e^j*theta was just a notation.

Then proceeded to just use it as if it was actually eulers number to the j arg. And I still don’t understand why and under what cases I can’t just assume it’s the actual thing.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

e^𝘪θ^ is not just notation. You can graph the entire function e^x+𝘪θ^ across the whole complex domain and find that it matches up smoothly with both the version restricted to the real axis (e^x^) and the imaginary axis (e^𝘪θ^). The complete version is:

e^x+𝘪θ^ := e^x^(cos(θ) + 𝘪sin(θ))

Various proofs of this can be found on wikipeda. Since these proofs just use basic calculus, this means we didn't need to invent any new notation along the way.

[–] shapis@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm aware of that identity. There's a good chance I misunderstood what she said about it being just a notation.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

It's not simply notation, since you can prove the identity from base principles. An alien species would be able to discover this independently.

load more comments (6 replies)