this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
651 points (96.0% liked)

The Democratic People's Republic of Tankiejerk

1119 readers
4 users here now

COMM HAS MOVED TO !tankiejerk@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

However it can be used to point out someone's hypocrisy. If country A is genociding people from country B, while screaming about people from country B genociding people from country C, "what about your genocide" is an appropriate response.

[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Calling out hypocrisy can be valid but it must further discussion, not shut it down. In your example, if country A is committing genocide while condemning country B for genocide, the problem isn't just country B’s actions. It's that country A is deflecting from its own crimes instead of addressing them.

Saying 'what about your genocide' only matters if it leads to accountability for both. If it's just used to avoid taking responsibility, then it's whataboutism. It shifts the focus without solving anything.

To reiterate, whataboutism is deflection meant to shut down further discussion.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Appealing to hypocrisy is a fallacy, full stop. Someone can be a hypocrite but that has no bearing on whether an action is justifiable for both/neither.