From https://aoav.org.uk/2023/an-analysis-of-the-7th-of-october-2023-casualties-in-israel-as-a-result-of-the-hamas-attack
Yes, 66% is awfully high(, and focusing on attacking military bases would have been suicide, i've also heard about the Hannibal directive, and if i stopped speaking in relative numbers i also know that palestinians were/are clearly at a loss in absolute terms under the law of retaliation), but since that's the threshold given to distinguish between a terrorist and a military operation, then Israel is a terrorist nation by its own standards. Not that anyone cares about giving an official definition to distinguish between a terrorist and a soldier/'resistance fighter'.
Some definitions don't even refer to a ratio civilians//military, and would make Israel #2 behind the US :
See also the U.S. definitions, it's not as if we had many laws against terrorists anyway(, domestic or not, they rarely make a distinction, Palestine Action didn't even hurt anyone).
I've also heard that it's the way that the murders are made, as if money mattered and using tanks&planes was more civilized.
I couldn't find an exhaustive data from Iran or Lebanon, but the majority of the victims were civilians :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iran%E2%80%93Israel_war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Israeli_invasion_of_Lebanon
Shameless israeli fuckers, try to justify that they couldn't wait until their target leave the crowd, not that they haven't done worse, they're killing ~100 people every day so it's just one event among others :
https://www.telesurenglish.net/israeli-strike-on-aid-queue-in-deir-al-balah-kills-16-including-10-children
Nothing would surprise me/us anymore, they're not humans :
ramblings
It's so useless to throw accusations, nobody cares if the accusation of terrorism are legitimate or if it's just one more hypocrisy on our never-ending list. I don't know what to do, how can nations just stand there watching ? Couldn't they at least apply economic pressure for the symbol ? It honestly feels as if they have accepted what's ahead, as if they dont believe that Israel could change its mind with enough pressure from them.
If they succeed then in the future they'll still have to get rid of the current extremists in the israeli government and (c)overtly support more humanist elected officials, as well as less psychopathic israeli medias. Israel won't change its path by anything else than brute force, at least Russia acted according to the will of the local population as well as in consequence to western interferences etc., Israel has no other excuses than their greed and their mistaken pretext that "you just can't live with palestinians", something already discussed abundantly.
There's no love, Yunus Emre was/is right, those that don't love can't be religious. You can still kill others while loving them(, less than the ones/causes you're protecting,) and that would lead to different wars than if you're hating them.

Not that i like to do this, but i'm pro-Hamas(, since they have no other choices left than violence in the face of colonization), and recognize that 'their bodycam'/'the dashcam/c.c.t.v.'/.. footages are authentic : https://archive.ph/Ux0yY
It's important to note that, yes, they didn't want to kill as many civilians as possible, that wasn't the aim of their operation, and the propaganda against them is, predictably, awfully biased. However even if Israel never released the full unedited footages, we have evidences : https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/18/israel/palestine-videos-hamas-led-attacks-verified
If you just say that they planned to take hostages(, and not simply "kill as many jews as they can",) then yes, we agree, but we have evidence of them killing some civilians, you can't just say "zero".
And, honestly, compared to what Israel did before&after it's not much. Of course for the western medias it's an irrecoverable trauma, we can spin things how we want, ignoring the victim's point of view while only presenting the tormentor's grievances.
And if you ask them, they'll say that they've exposed the palestinian suffering, while most of it stays hidden except on social medias(, who have to be "regulated"). But i'll admit that the western media coverage could have been worse, and won't deny that it shifted its critical stance towards Israel after a while.
I.d.k., perhaps, but at the same time they trained with paragliders, Egypt even warned Israel in advance. The theory that Israel let it happen because it gave them a cassus belli doesn't seem that foolish either, who knows...
In any case Oct.7th wasn't much compared to the deaths of these past decades, and the palestinian cause wouldn't have been much more advanced without it, we(sterners) are just letting the number of illegal colonies grow with the time while claiming that we support a "two-states solution".
It's probably not your thing to think about Israel's interests, but what solution would please both sides in your opinion and stop this destruction ? Again, no point in arguing for a solution that Israel would refuse, there are more than one option that could please both sides, even if people aren't discussing them. It's probably a useless question to ask you, but it seems to me that this question is more pertinent than every other discussion we could have.
Thanks in advance if you're interested in this less pointless task than a discussion on Oct.7th
and fuck a peace that is acceptable to both side. Genocidal fascists belong in a hole. Kill them all. They don't get a voice in the settlement.
And israelis will say the same thing towards the palestinians.
Anyway, thanks for having supported me that long, and for your interesting informations, bye :)
I'm not saying "no israeli civilians" were killed by the resistance on october 7th. I am saying that there was no organizational intention to kill civilians. I'm saying the the number is under 100.
Human rights watch is a western puppet. The videos they got came from the israelis. The article has 3 incidents and the context surrounding the incidents is purposely missing. There is no link to the videos, so we have to trust that hrw's analysis is correct.
The 3rd story is the most telling re-read it. Every israeli in the article gets the "wearing civilian clothing" line except the person killed in the 3rd story.
Put the whole thing together and you get a story of a soldier/security/police using a civilian as cover. He got shot, the resistance fighters stopped shooting when they realized the soldier was hit and the remaining person was a civilian covered in a soldiers blood. They lead the civilian away and another fighter finished off the soldier instead of leaving him to bleed out and die slowly.
And that is the 3rd best evidence they could find.
The other incidents near the kibbutz and shelter could have been idf commanders that had been intentionally targeted by the resistance. Or they could have just ditched their guns a moment before the video starts. We don't know.