this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
1258 points (99.3% liked)

196

5377 readers
429 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They've literally done these things whenever and to however much extent possible. You seem to think having permanently 50 or less senators overcomes the supermajority. It's like you're not even capable of parsing that information.

[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Republicans don't allow that to stop them. When the Dems had all three branches of government during Obama's first term they let McConnell fuck with judge picks the entire fucking time. What did the Dems do when Trump came into office and started picking judges? Fuck all.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/here-are-the-senate-democrats-voting-for-trump-nominated-judges-and-why/

The Dems are a broken feckless party and need to be replaced. I don't even know who their target base voter is, because it isn't me. I am not looking for a center-right pro-billionaire party.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

It also didn't stop Democrats from passing the massive inflation reduction act.

The key here is Reconciliation of Budget, either the federal government shuts down in opposition to a bill like these or one party buckles to the other.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They can get rid of the rule holding them back at any time.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But with 50 or less that means getting rid of the rule holding Republicans back.

Just look how well it turned out removing filibuster for Cabinet appointees.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The filibuster that republicans remove when its convenient? The dems wouldnt need to proceed with the assumption the republicans were about to take control if they actually improved the immediate material conditions of their constituents. Theres also a million things they could have done by executive order.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I hate to "both sides" this conversation, but neither of these political parties have been working in the interests of the people for a real long time.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The filibuster has not been removed in my lifetime AFAIK.

The rules were modified to stop the senate from filibustering cabinet in 2013 and SCOTUS nominations in 2020, and remain not in effect to this day.

Before Trump 2.0 I think Biden held the record for executive orders.