this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
252 points (100.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7388 readers
6 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world
252
Privatize or downsize the USPS? Rural customers worry either option will hurt them (www.iowapublicradio.org)
submitted 1 week ago by Lupo@lemmy.world to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Rick Wallace, 77, voted for Trump and supports his cost-cutting agenda, to a point.

“There are government programs that I’d like to see discontinued or cut back, especially those that don’t affect me,” said the retired Scottsbluff firefighter. “But the ones like the Postal Service, yes, we count on them.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If usps doesn’t want to deliver to rural addresses, fine, but set up some alternatives. Create a secured remote mailbox, or offer P.O. Boxes for free.

The fundamental problem here is that the US population doesn't really want to pay for stuff where they don't directly benefit. In "me first" politics, rural populations are screwed.

[–] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 week ago

And may they have the day they voted for.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

Exactly. Nothing is free, and having free po boxes just means the public will pay. And since you can't pay for things you don't directly benefit from in the current zeitgeist, it's not happening.