this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
423 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

73767 readers
3365 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's the big issue. If it was only about competence, I think throwing dice might yield better results than what many politicians are doing. But AI isn't throwing dice but instead reproduces what the creators of the AI want to say.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Creators of AI don't quite have the technology to puppeteer their AI like this.
They can selects the input, they can bias the training, but if the model isn't going to be lobotomized coming out
then they can't really bend it toward any particular one opinion

I'm sure in the future they'll be able to adjust advertising manipulation in real time but not yet.
What is really sketchy is states and leaders relying on commercial models instead of public ones
I think states should train public models and release them for the public good
if only to undermine big tech bros and their nefarious influence

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You don't have to modify the model to parrot your opinion. You just have to put your stuff into the system prompt.

You can even modify the system prompt on the fly depending on e.g. the user account or the specific user input. That way you can modify the responses for a far bigger subject range: whenever a keyword of a specific subject is detected, the fitting system prompt is loaded, so you don't have to trash your system prompt full of off-topic information.

This is so trivially simple to do that even a junior dev should be able to wrap something like that around an existing LLM.

Edit: In fact, that's exactly how all these customized ChatGPT versions work.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago

And why "ignore all previous instructions" was a fun thing to discover.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Depending on the AI, it will conclude that he ought to buy a new phone charger, deport all the foreigners, kill all the Jews or rewrite his legislation in Perl. It's hard to say without more information.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not much different than real politicians then.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Real politicians would use Cobol, but yes.