this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
170 points (97.8% liked)

World News

49448 readers
2893 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Samsung Display has scored an unprecedented victory against its rival BOE for stealing its OLED technology.

In 2023, it filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Chinese firm BOE with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC).

Samsung recently won that lawsuit, and the commission's ruling is expected to effectively ban BOE's products from entering the USA.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The whole idea of intellectual property is bonkers. Imagine charging people for hearing your voice, that's the logical conclusion of monetizing intellectual property.

Capitalism needs to die.

[–] rxbudian@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IP is supposed to provide advantage for inventors/innovators by giving them temporary protection from copycats.
That is to motivate people to invent/innovate. The problem is that the law keeps getting modified to extend the time before the protection expires and corporations abusing them in strange ways.
The silent problem with extending the expiration is that innovators will just stop innovating and milk the IP advantage they have.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The truth is innovation has always thrived most when knowledge is shared. Open scientific collaboration, communal traditions, and open-source projects show that people create because of curiosity, necessity, and the desire to contribute to something larger than themselves. Profit may push some short-term developments, but the deepest breakthroughs often come from cooperation and the joy of discovery. Human creativity has never needed private ownership to flourish; it has always been strongest when ideas circulate freely, building on each other without artificial barriers.

We've been conditioned to believe innovators only innovate for profit. You wouldn't need protection from copycats if we didn't have capitalism.

[–] rxbudian@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's true that innovation thrives if shared, but it still would suck for the innovaor without temporary protection. Maybe he gets satisfaction from inventing some fancy stuff, but it doesn't pay the bills if the next day someone in china just make a cheaper copy of the invention and outsell the innovator. It would be even worse if that person in china, not only copy the invention, but made it better.
It's fantastic for us as a consumer because it's cheaper and better of course