this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
126 points (100.0% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
7741 readers
494 users here now
Rules:
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
- Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
- If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
- Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
- Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
- This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Congress loves to pass legislation with a delayed effect. We saw the Bush Tax Cuts phase in over a decade, only to suddenly Sunset and threaten an enormous tax spike. When Obama took office, he rallied a Democratic majority to save much of the Bush Tax Cut plan, for fear of upsetting the party's mega-donors.
I guess we can ask the question of the next Congress. Will they defuse the Medicaid bomb and let their constituents eat shit? Or will they kick the can down the road again, because deficits are easier to stomach than unpopular social policy?
Five years ago, I'd have said kicking the can was the preferred strategy. But now? It seems like liberal and conservative politicians alike are nakedly embracing electoral nihilism, on the theory that gerrymandering and fear-mongering will guarantee their positions indefinitely regardless of public policy.