Technology

37551 readers

285 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

X will make audio and video calls a premium subscriber-only feature (techcrunch.com)

submitted 11 months ago by UrLogicFails@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive link: https://archive.ph/jFcSY

Last month X CEO Linda Yaccarino confirmed that video calls would be coming to the app formerly known as Twitter as part of its transition into an “everything app.” Now, new code in the X app reveals that both audio and video calls will be supported. However, the feature will not be available to all X users — only those with an X Premium membership, it appears.

lines of code refer to a warning that appears when someone tries to DM another user on the app which explains that “audio and video calls are a premium feature,” and entices them to “subscribe to gain access.”

To date, X has not been able to make a compelling case for X Premium, as independent research indicated that the company has only sold roughly 1 million subscriptions

By comparison, Snapchat’s premium subscription Snapchat+ just topped the 5 million user mark. Meanwhile, analysts are forecasting Meta’s subscription, Meta Verified, will have 12 million subscribers by early next year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Kik used to be popular for Clash of Clans groups because you did not need to share the phone number and it was free. Now there is Telegram for that as it became much more popular and the app is generally more polished. And again, was free.

Nobody will buy it for this.

[–] xx3r@lemmy.studio 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The default nowadays is Discord, especially for online-based communities.

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Telegram still requires a phone number. Bad news for teenagers who don't have a phone yet.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

I was aiming at the fact that you don't need to share the number

I find annoying that you need a phone number for Telegram. I had to open a completely new phone number to make a work Telegram account.

[–] monkeyflower@infosec.exchange 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

@yum13241
VOIP numbers work ;)
@SSUPII @technology

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Getting one that doesn't go away if you don't send a message every 2 seconds is as hard as fuck.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can you suggest VOIP numbers that allow you to use them like normal phones. I wanted one for using in services that might need calling me.

[–] JCPhoenix@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I have a Google Voice number. Completely free. I used to give out to clients instead of my actual cell number. So that when I left, I could just recycle the number. Never recycled it, but I still use it as a backup/for trash purposes.

Though some systems out there that need a phone number do block Google Voice numbers during registration.