this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
1452 points (96.4% liked)

memes

9807 readers
1874 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Self Checkouts are not job killers. they still need people to run them. Most stores have 3 SCO clusters that need 3 attendants each per day. thats 9 jobs right there, add in weekend coverage, vacations, part timers, etc and most grocery stores will have a need for around 15 cashiers which is not easy for any store to fully staff.

source: ive worked grocery stores for around 10 years.

[–] xanu@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How many people are needed to run an equivalent amount of non self checkouts? Just because they need some employees doesn't mean they aren't reducing the amount of jobs overall.

[–] dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

It is not a one to one comparison, sco is significantly slower than the cashier (not sure about US but here Aldi/Lidl cashiers are madness). So i will just put a random number here but the ratio might be something lik 1:3 where 1 cashier would swap 3 SCOs. I still believe it is reducing staff and that is the whole point.

[–] moog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Our sco clusters have 6 stations each. you literally couldnt fit 18 more registers in our store let alone staff them. We have 8 registers and we've not once been able to fully staff those registers. at any given time we can find staff for maybe 4 of them.

[–] Steak@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk where you live but around here they used to have 10 cashiers open at busy days. Now it's 20 self checkouts and 3 people "watching". It absolutely got rid of some jobs.

[–] moog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've never seen or heard of someone getting fired and replaced by a SCO. it just doesnt happen.

[–] Steak@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah they just wait until they quit and then don't hire another person. Duh

[–] moog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No actually they dont. Ive worked in grocery stores for 10 years that is not how it works.

[–] Steak@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does it work then? And why would stores invest in these if it didn't save them money?

[–] moog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Because cashiering sucks ass? and no one wants to do it so theyre constantly understaffed. being a SCO attendant is nicer for the employees and the customers a lot of the time. but its not feasible for every transaction so there will still always be a need for cashiers. Maybe you shouldnt talk about something you havent done yourself cause im not explaining this to you any more.