116
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 9 months ago

Now imagine if you bought one of these.

Is there any Google project outside of early search and Gmail they did right?

[-] narwhal@lemmy.ml 30 points 9 months ago

Maps and Photos are ok IMO. Slowly getting shittier though.

[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 9 months ago

Maps were bought by Google from different company. Photos is AFAIK actually made by them.

[-] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago

Photos as an online photo gallery is their implementation yes but they bought up Picasa the desktop gallery early on. That software included tagging and I believe face recognition by the end.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 9 months ago

Picasa, now that's a name I haven't heard in a llooonnngggggg time

[-] TrustingZebra@lemmy.one 2 points 9 months ago

Photos is cool but weirdly much lower than every other gallery app.

[-] narwhal@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

For local gallery. Simple gallery is better.

But for searching your photos, Google photos is still pretty great.

[-] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

I highly suggest taking a look at Aves for a local gallery app. I use it in combination with Immich.

[-] TrustingZebra@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago

Yep those are the two I use!

[-] cnnrduncan@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

Wasn't Google Photos super racist a few years back?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
  • Android
  • Drive
  • Docs
  • Translate
  • Material
  • Angular
  • Kubernetes
  • Flutter
  • Go
  • TensorFlow
  • Pixel

And many others I miss. It's a bit mind boggling how many things this corp has done. They have killed so many and there still so many yet, and many open source projects.

[-] CylustheVirus@beehaw.org 7 points 9 months ago

Well when you hoover up companies left and right...

[-] SourWeasel 1 points 9 months ago

As a heavy Docs user, I'm beginning to see lots of odd choices that they don't seem interested in fixing that ultimately result in a somewhat broken product. For example, there are still loads of things that can only be done in Google docs for web, so on an Android device you are forced to try to get a browser to load Docs in desktop mode to make a handful of changes all while fighting the OS trying to move you over the native app that lacks the features you need. I have similar issues with Gmail. Then there are things like Google Home that have the opposite issue, forcing you to move to a mobile device or emulate one on the desktop just to change a few settings.

And in some cases, their web vs. native app mentality makes zero sense to me. They actually built then removed the Google Shopping list Android app and now only have the web version, cause everyone shops with their laptop sitting open in the cart, right? /s I can use the web version on my phone's browser, but then for some reason it wants to arrange my shopping list alphabetically rather than the order I chose that matches the store layout. Wtf? It also previously had clear color photos automatically added for every item that made it much faster to navigate, but they removed them completely without comment.

[-] cnqr@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

I wouldn’t include Tensorflow in the list. Tensorflow’s dates are numbered too.

Google internally all but switched to JAX.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
116 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37208 readers
211 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS