this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
555 points (97.8% liked)

World News

38554 readers
2551 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

~~He was found extorting little girls with nude pics he generated of them.~~

Edit: So I guess he just generated them. In that case, how'd they become public? I guess this is the problem if you don't read the article.

[–] Missjdub@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Earlier this month, police in Spain launched an investigation after images of underage girls were altered with AI to remove their clothing and sent around town. In one case, a boy had tried to extort one of the girls using a manipulated image of her naked, the girl’s mother told the television channel Canal Extremadura.

That was another case in Spain. Not the guy in Korea. The person in Korea didn’t distribute the images.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I really gotta wonder what the difference is between prosecuting someone for their thoughts and prosecuting them for jerking it to their own artwork/generative whatever they kept entirely to themselves. The only bad I see here is someone having their privacy invaded by someone else bigger than them and being put on display for it. Sounds familiar?

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why the fuck isn't that the headline? Jesus, that's really awful and changes everything.

[–] Obonga@feddit.de 18 points 11 months ago

Because that was another case. Extortion and blackmail (and in this case would count as production of cp as would be the case if you would draw after a real child) are already illegal. On this case we simply dont have enough information.