this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
278 points (93.2% liked)

Open Source

31111 readers
349 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Without disliking the fediverse at all, I think what really hits the bell is nostr

Its a similar discussion as with renewable energies/storage: like which technology to focus without wasting resources?

[–] blue_berry@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its peer-to-peer, right? How do they handle moderation in there?

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

This is what I was wondering.

There are ways to do it. Whitelists and blocklists people can subscribe to (with different moderation strategies), with maybe default logic for integrating different lists and an easily extensible format for clients or end users to write their own scripts to do more complex combinations would go a long way.

But as much as "decentralized" sounds cool, I think more structured communities for content work better. Reddit worked so well as a source for information before it shit the bed because it allowed communities to form with their own standards and ideas. It was flawed, but a hell of a lot more coherent than twitter was, because structure is useful.