this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
130 points (95.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9505 readers
6 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Another great piece from Jalopnik.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InevitableWaffles@midwest.social 53 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I'm about five miles from my work with OK bike infrastructure to get there. My problem is every dickhead rolling coal on a lifted F350 seems to think I'm worth 500 points. Until they either protect the biking infrastructure or hit these people driving massive vehicles with some real pentalities for driving like idiots, I'll have to keep using my car for safety.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

i wonder if the self-driving cars will make bicycling safer or more dangerous? the recent shrug and pray approaches to the software aren't reassuring enough

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Physically separate bike paths (like not connected to roads. A.k.a multiuse paths) and bike first intersections are going to be the safest way forward.

Self-driving cars can be safer in some ways, but not always.

[–] InevitableWaffles@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

Given the fact they are still running over pedestrians, I wouldnt hold a lot of hope.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I sometimes bike to work (~15 miles each way), but fortunately to have a trail I can take a good chunk of the ride to work.

Unfortunately I get off after-dark and its closed (I wouldn't ride it at night even if it were technically open), so stuck riding a sometimes poorly lit stroad for a five-mile stretch home that's down to 1-lane much of the way because of never-ending construction with no shoulder or bike lane (plus stroads most of the other 10 miles home). I couldn't recommend the ride to anyone until the construction is gone. Would be great if they'd put some protected bike lanes there though, but given the trails available during the day, non-night riders and non-bike commuters would probably feel like its redundant.

[–] buckenmuck@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why is the trail closed?

We have a portion of a trail that closes for no reasonable purpose at like 5pm. We've been fighting to keep it open--lanes of car traffic don't just close unless it goes through private property. Why should bike trails?

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Its an unlit winding trail along a steep drop off with pigs (and I do not mean cops - another part of the trail is directly on their station and I've never had any issue riding there at night: its lit, ironically by car dealerships, and not along a steep drop off; it also does have pigs out hunting at night though).

[–] buckenmuck@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Huh. Is there a reason a fence doesn’t work there? If pigs were wandering into a road, both the owner and the city would want to eliminate that conflict

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

Its a nature trail meant for well-off office-workers to go for recreation during the day, so they're not going to build several miles of fencing for poorer people to commute at night. Pigs are primarily nocturnal, so they're not an issue during the day.

Also roads obstructing wildlife migration is already a problem. We shouldn't be trying to expand that.

[–] andrew@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I recommend getting some bright lights. I have a 350 lumens rear light that makes my bike more visible than most vehicles.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Switch to using an ebike this year, so it has its built in light, I have another rear light that blinks (not very bright and turned so its not directly facing drivers), and recently got a helmet with a front and rear light. Also wear bright clothes and have reflective stickers on my bike and stripes on pannier. I still don't trust some of the cars given passing in-lane is the only option for them to pass and the lane is too narrow for that.

[–] biddy@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago

in-lane is the only option for them to pass and the lane is too narrow for that.

In this case the correct thing to do legally is to take the whole lane, but I get that having cars honking at you is stressful.