this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
632 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38511 readers
2808 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd propose a modified version

With allies and neutrals negotiate an immigration policy case by case to achieve a balance which best benefits both sides of the transit.

With enemies, open the gates and make a point of how everyone who's able to choose will at least be extremely tempted to choose the US.

Even better since we're in a day and age when America's geopolitical enemies are already in demographic crises, adopting this policy would basically set up enemy nations for abject failure while solidifying America's own demographic balance, and in an extended sense, that of America's allies.

Meanwhile we avoid brain draining potential allies like opening the flood gates with mexico would achieve.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.