this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
578 points (89.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5490 readers
984 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And I don't think you've ever considered the amount of food and water required for just a kilo of meat.

Hint: It's exponentially more than a kilo of veggies or grains.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

you haven't been reading what I'm writing.

buy a cow. put it in a pasture. come back in 18 months.

OR

buy seed. till. plant. water. feed. harvest.

the time investment per calorie is vastly different.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah good luck with that when 8 billion people start doing that. Moron.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

the discussion is about effort, not scalability.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We've got machines for that stuff.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

running machines still takes effort. letting a cow live doesn't.