this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
15 points (89.5% liked)

College Football

823 readers
7 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

Vote in the community poll

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Texas Texas
2. Alabama Alabama
3. Tennessee Tennessee
T-4. Oregon Oregon
T-4. Penn State Penn State
6. Ohio State Ohio State
7. Miami Miami
8. Missouri Missouri
9. Iowa State Iowa State
10. Michigan Michigan
T-11. BYU BYU
T-11. Indiana Indiana
T-11. UNLV UNLV
T-14. LSU Louisiana State
T-14. Notre Dame Notre Dame
16. USC USC
17. Clemson Clemson
18. Georgia Georgia
19. Ole Miss Mississippi
20. Oklahoma Oklahoma
21. Illinois Illinois
22. James Madison James Madison
23. Kentucky Kentucky
T-24. Duke Duke
T-24. Pitt Pitt

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheAndrewBrown@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

There are rules about attending practices in person or using electronic devices to aid in sign stealing. But if you just notice your opponent using a specific sign and it correlating certain plays or schemes, that’s just part of the game. It’s a team’s responsibility to obfuscate their signs, otherwise why use signs at all? If you weren’t allowed to see what the sideline is signaling to the players, just hold the play name up on a card, then you could save time teaching kids the signals.

I’m guessing the investigation is more to make sure they didn’t use one of the outlawed methods, and I’m willing to bet they didn’t and just got pretty good at figuring out signs. Or are just good enough that teams think that’s what they’re doing.