this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
182 points (94.2% liked)

Games

16471 readers
783 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] kromem@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Not really.

By design was using procedural generation to build out the planets and to place points of interest into the world.

But what's wild is that they had such repetitive and uninteresting "points of interest."

They aren't interesting at all. The name is a lie.

So yeah, if you wander the procedurally generated planet you can come across a cave. But it's effectively the same cave you have gone through a half dozen times already.

My suspicion is that the creation engine isn't very well equipped for complex procedural generation, so the point of interest areas are also broken up onto reused tiles that get repetitive quickly, as opposed to more modern engines that allow for procedurally generating levels and assets with enough entropy that even if it looks familiar it isn't that it looks exactly the same.

Like, just look at the demoed features of UE5's procedural generation, and how much less repetitive it looks when filling in areas than Starfield.

I expected more from Bethesda given Todd Howard has been focused on procedural generation for decades now, but I think they really shot themselves in the foot with not sending creation engine to a farm upstate.

Yes, they were able to reuse a lot from past development, but the core of what they were trying to deliver completely fell apart ultimately and his decades old dream project is going to be forgotten within a few years.

[โ€“] all-knight-party@kbin.run 2 points 11 months ago

It's too bad procedural generation gets away as such a blanket term. What Starfield's non quest planets really have is procedural generation of the geography of the surface, and then procedural placement of hand designed plant, animal, and mineral assets, then procedural placement of hand designed points of interest and buildings. The factory dungeon you just went through was by no means procedurally generated.