this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
277 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18968 readers
3426 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leadore@kbin.social 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

No Republican senator has yet expressed public support for the resolution, and those viewed as most likely to vote “yes” say they would prefer to resolve the impasse in another way.

That's because they'll get death threats if they appear to cooperate with Democrats in any way. Just like we saw in the House and winding up with Gaetz's choice of Mike Johnson for Speaker, Repub Senators are just as terrified to go against Mangolini's magats.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think republicans senators clearly remember maga insurrectionists chanting, "hang Mike Pence" on January 6th

[–] leadore@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and running for their lives and hiding from the mob.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It still boggles my mind that we had a violent insurrection. We all watched something on the news that will be in history books and will be a lecture topic in college us history courses for years to come.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We all watched something on the news that will be in history books and will be a lecture topic in college us history courses for years to come.

If we're lucky it will go down that way. If we're not, it will just be a footnote to what happens in 2025 or 2029.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I've thought that before many times

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not advocating for violence but shit... Republicans are cowards. I didn't realize you could just bully them into doing things.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Right? Nancy Pelosi had a violent mob chant for her death as they broke into her place of work, and she basically rolled her eyes and kept doing her job.

These wannabe tough guy GOP pussies sure like to act tough, but slink away with their tails between their legs at the first impotent threat

[–] DigitalFrank@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s because they’ll get death threats

Worse than death threats, they might not be reelected. And that's the most important thing (to them).

[–] leadore@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Fear of being primaried is certainly strong enough to get them to go along with almost anything, but since the rise of the Manchurian Cantaloupe it really has gone far beyond that to fear of literal violence against them and their families. They are thoroughly intimidated and under the control of the extremists.

Of course the threats and violence also extend to election workers, judges, government employees, etc. Remember what happened to Nancy Pelosi's husband as just one example among many in the last few years.
https://plus.thebulwark.com/p/the-fear-factor-in-republican-politics-trump