this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37634 readers
400 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Them trying to force control away from users is bad.

But arm's efficiency make it a damn good option for a thin client.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Yah, I’m really not enthused with the idea of having to pay monthly rent for my computers ability to function.

I wonder if intel just values their existing experience with 86 more than any potential efficiency gains since the efficiency matters a lot less when the whole system is just a glorified screen and antenna.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

I think it matters more.

Apple's battery life is so good in large part because ARM is way better at low end power draw.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago

I'd say their recent trend towards packing in E(fficiency)-cores along with their previously standard P(erformance)-core design shows that they're sensitive to and reacting to both the higher core counts of AMD and the greater efficiency of ARM

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm really not sure even Microsoft could get away with that

The moment a subscription service comes into play for something they take for granted as free people will start looking at alternatives. Chromebooks and macbooks exist and from what I hear Chromebooks are starting to become serious competition for Windows

Plus Linux desktop obviously getting more user friendly and preinstalled on laptops

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Them taking control away from me makes me not use them. Not a problem at all.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was never too deep because I always hated everything about Windows UX, but I was stuck with them for gaming for a bit. Luckily Steam fixed that for pretty much everything I wanted to play but Madden (and after hours of it also not working on a separate Windows install I tried just for that purpose, I threw in the towel on that, too).

The funny thing is I actually kind of like the idea of a thin client as a general rule. Not for gaming or anything else latency sensitive, but offloading heavy lifting is perfectly fine with me. Just not in a way I don't have control of.

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

I'm stuck with it because of work. Luckily, "Industry 4.0" is completely fucking fed up with M$ and they're abandoning Windows in droves. I'm just waiting for my vendor to finish polishing their MacOS and Linux alternatives.