this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
328 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

7202 readers
419 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Supply chains, worker wages and the price of energy has been blamed for the current bout of high inflation. But central bankers around the world are starting to clue in to something consumers have been aware of for a while β€” corporations just aren't afraid to raise their prices anymore.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Neato@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There's a solution: legally mandating price ceilings. Good luck getting through Congress but the solution to market coordination can't be market forces.

[–] Prezhotnuts@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We don't have a congress in Canada, so it would be impossible.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh he was talking about America on an article about Canada in a Canadian community. Because he doesn’t read articles, just posts uninformed hot takes that he expects everyone to agree with.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I did the same thing, but it's because we're all seeing the same things as far as cost increases and governments sitting on their hands.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Couldn't your parliament enact such price caps?

[–] Prezhotnuts@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Yes they absolutely could.

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There’s a solution: legally mandating price ceilings

This populist idea has been done many times and it always leads to the same outcome: businesses stop stocking unprofitable items.

Learn from history, people.

[–] Neato@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The ceiling would have to still be profitable. And if this is a thing people need but can't afford while profitable, the government should provide it.

People need to learn from history and realize corporations exist to serve the people and at the people's pleasure. You have to apply for a corporation and a we've seen with Trump, can be dissolved. Which should really happen a lot more often.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That leads to unexpected consequences of them. Shrinkflation, strong-arming suppliers even more, etc. And then adminstrating/enforcing against infractions just becomes prohibitive to maintain.

[–] Neato@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Maybe. But we already do this for a lot of things. Drugs is the most well-known. If we know what the production cost is (and the government can just request that info), we can set the price ceiling to ensure the profit floor still exists. This is pretty common in government contracts: % profit.