this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
492 points (79.0% liked)

memes

8801 readers
2947 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

CloudConvert.com might as well be my fucking home page.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Firefox supports JXL just fine and chrome did support it, but pulled support shortly after.

[–] LucidLethargy@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is the source I used to originally validate my position: https://caniuse.com/jpegxl

Let me know if it's incorrect, I'd be very interested to learn of new options for the web space as a developer. This said, I googled Firefox and it came back with only "experimental support" for what I think may be an alpha release (version number ends in "a").

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think you still need to enable JXL in the config, but it seems to display just fine once enabled.

Adding support for JXL in windows was much more of a hassle and doesn't always display properly in the file preview. Hopefully windows follows Apple's step soon and adds native support.

I guess as a Web developer it won't matter until the JXL toggle is enabled by default though.