this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
91 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18863 readers
4371 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 35 points 10 months ago (4 children)

If he's too crazy to be guilty, then he's too dangerous to be freed.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (7 children)

It's tough. He was radicalized, largely by YouTube, from what I've read. I don't believe prison should be punitive, just rehabilitative. If he really can come to terms with his radicalization, I don't see why he can't come back to reality and contribute to society.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would want him to be required to attend therapy and psychiatric evaluation for a while at minimum. Tendency to conspiratorial thinking is something people like that battle their whole lives.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Oh yeah, I'm definitely not advocating for him to just get let loose on the streets. Just saying he doesn't need to spend his whole life behind bars

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 10 months ago

I can agree with that. I have a friend who has a PhD in Administration of Justice, and having himself spent years in jail despite being innocent, he opened my eyes to the desperate need for prison reform (and why it works better than purely punitive prison, for most).

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I think this is being blind to the scale of the issue.

The entire MAGA cult is as radicalized as this guy, some more, some less. But most probably as radicalized. There are maybe 1-3 million die-hards?

They successfully took the capitol in an attempted coup.

I'm sorry, but this sentiment of yours is misguided. He isn't a one off. He's part of a movement. We need to be considering this issue in a broader context.

[–] donuts@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He still needs to spend most of the rest of his life being "rehabilitated" in jail or in a psychiatric facility.

You don't simply get to inflict a potentially lethal and disabling traumatic brain injury against someone and then get out of jail free because you're "sorry" [that you got in trouble]. This man, and people like him, need to spend time away from society so that they can truly have time to process what they've done. Anything else would be an injustice to the victims.

Some brain injuries can lead to fates which are far worse than imprisonment or death; paralysis, inability to communicate, mental retardation, excrutiating and random neuropathic pain, and other things that have major implications for quality of life. And any person who would intentionally inflict such an injury on another person needs to go away for a long, long time.

I was taught growing up that we are ALL just 1 brain injury away from a drastically worse life, and it's true.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

So put him in prison with nothing but NPR and PBS to rehabilitate him?

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It isn't tough at all, of course he needs rehab and of course he needs to be segregated from society while he's doing it.

What's tough is that there is no such system that can do that. That is to say: the problem here isn't anything to do with this particular case, and everything to do with the prison industrial complex.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Ok, and the 5-10 million other people that are as radicalized/ if not more radicalized?

DO they get a pass because they 'live in alternative reality'?

They would gas people they don't approve of. This isn't fucking around.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Not punitive??? He hit Paul in the head with a goddamn hammer. The fuck are you talking about??

Yes, he absolutely needs rehabilitation before reentering society, but just because he was radicalized by watching YouTube doesn’t mean he should be excused for attempted deadly force.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The obsession with being punitive is why we have the plurality of the world’s prisoners. Something like 1 in 4 prisoners are in the USA.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I agree but it also should be protective. He did what he did and that should probably come with a very long probation once he’s out. It’s not enough to know better, we need to trust he’s able to function in the world without going back to radicalizing content even when triggered.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

That's how insanity pleas are supposed to work. You don't go free, you just get locked up in a different place, and without a date set for your release.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah that’s usually how insanity works. If you want to be free asap don’t plead insanity. What could’ve been over in a decade could easily be the equivalent of life probation if you’re ever deemed sane enough to be let out

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Yeah that’s usually how insanity works. If you want to be free asap don’t plead insanity. What could’ve been over in a decade could easily be the equivalent of life probation if you’re ever deemed sane enough to be let out