this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
526 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4706 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

He cited, as supposed evidence, the decline of national church attendance and the rise of LGBTQ youth — the fact, Johnson lamented, that “one-in-four high school students identifies as something other than straight.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

a firearm per person should be enough for that. A NINETY MILLION FIREARM SURPLUS isn't necessary to become ungovernable. It's become ungovernable in a civil society.

come on, tell me you don't have one shirt, one hat, some piece of FLAIR that has an AR silhouette on it?

COME ON. Don't lie. You act like it's patriotism and there's something very sick going on there.

You wouldn't defend it otherwise.

[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Actually it's Marxism, not patriotism. And no I dont fetish guns; I've lost some people to them. I just know what happens when everyone just sits around grumbling while fascism takes over. Now tell me how we should protect free speech for fascists and how that will stop them. Cone on, don't lie.

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cone on

cone off. cone on, cone off, either way it's a stupid fucking argument. let's follow your choo-choo train of thought: how many is enough then? 500m? 700m?

how many firearms should I have access to between the shitter and the shower for safety, son? tell me you own stock in colt without saying so already.

I just know what happens when everyone just sits around grumbling while fascism takes over.

sure bud. you can't hear it, but I'm rolling my eyes at your experience. good luck with that.

[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Idiots conflate firearms ownership with competency. These idiots leave tens of thousands of firearms in their cars every year to get stolen.

https://jalopnik.com/youve-got-to-stop-keeping-your-gun-in-your-car-1850929717

They leave them where kids can get with them, and firearms are now the number one killer, worse than CARS.

https://people.com/man-gets-hundred-years-accidentally-killing-daughter-aiming-gun-son-8387044

and of course everyone's fav, suicide. Guns R #1 wooh freedumb. Yee and haw.

https://apnews.com/article/suicides-record-2022-guns-48511d74deb24d933e66cec1b6f2d545

And yet you still think the answer is more guns.

Frankly, at this point, you're arguments weak and/or pointless and your inability to articulate anything resembling reason, well, I'm glad your cows left. I hope they went on to a better place. You obviously didn't deserve their company.

[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

lazy riposte.

I bet at the end those cows fucking hated you.

[–] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hey man, it's nerdy, it's like how some camgirls have a dildo collection, it's culture for people with money to spare and little time to invest

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

bet those dildos get used by someone with proficiency and an eye toward safety.

Unlike firearms.