this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
71 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17941 readers
23 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why I like the GPL. I'm fine with people using my software for personal use, or for commercial use if that's integrated in another open source software.

If a company want to use my software with an unrestrictive opensource license, we're going to have to discuss license price.

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GPL code can be used in proprietary products as long as it is not distributed outside. There are a lot of such use cases.

[–] wiki_me@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At this point i think everybody should just use the AGPL instead of the GPL.

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

There was an instance where Google used a GPL software (GNU units?) in their backend and didn't release the modifications because they were technically not distributing it. So yes. It supports your suggestion of using AGPL where its purpose is not immediately apparent. It's a good thing that people are starting to accept copyleft licenses after the anti-copyleft tirade promoted by the industry.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Seconded, AGPL may be better especially in cases where software is network related.