this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
310 points (99.1% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3989 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the northwest corner of Louisiana, a candidate for parish sheriff is demanding a recount after losing by a single vote in an election where more than 43,000 people voted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 30 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The latest batch of tankie propaganda is that it doesn't matter if you vote because no election is ever decided by a single vote. Ignoring the hilarity of the people using collective action as an argument saying that, this is why it matters. Because local and even state elections often have ridiculously small margins

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Tankies have been on that one for awhile now

They'll straight up mock you for even suggesting that voting is effective at anything

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 months ago

"you're stupid if you think that will accomplish anything" and "they are the same party" is pretty old hat.

Haven't seen the argument that individual votes don't matter so individuals shouldn't vote until recently. Is kind of a step up since it plays to the smug factor

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I just say to them, "so don't vote. Not my problem." They don't know what to do about that.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I too don't know how to respond when someone tells me to do exactly what I had planned to do and was advocating for others to do?

We can't have another 2016.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You are advocating for others to not vote?

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

No. But by not disputing stupidity, you are

Your witty response is to agree with them

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

It's not a witty response. I honestly don't give a shit if they don't vote. If they do vote, it will be for someone like Jill Stein or whatever dumbass the Libertarians are running this year, so fuck them.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Voting is the only thing that changes the rules. Protests, donations, volunteering, etc. are all meant to influence voting. Voting is the only thing that works.

No, money can't buy everything. It can only influence. You are not going to bribe a Republican to raise taxes, or a (real, not fake) Democrat to vote for Trump.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 months ago

...voting is very much not the only thing. Sure, it's important, but there's far far more to politics than just voting.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 3 points 9 months ago

Protests are definitely not just to influence voting, unless you also mean "influencing politicians to propose and vote for law changes"

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Tankie = nice useful idiot for effective pincer maneuver from the right.

While the right galvanizes their voters with "these very limited interventions is communism"

Tankies undermine the left's enthusiasm: "Not left enough" to make a difference.

Oh yeah? Enjoy the current supreme Court.