this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
509 points (93.1% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2367 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

he said. “We’ll be gone, and it’ll be gone because of an advertiser boycott.”... eeer, no.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I hope the boards of Tesla and SpaceX are paying attention. Once Xitter goes down in flames, he'll be looking for the next project to micromanage into bankruptcy.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't he have done that first?

Twitters downfall is intentional, if he wanted to micromanage Tesla and SpaceX he would have. This is all a symptom of the fact that he didn't want to buy Twitter in the first place, he was using it as a coverup for selling stock in Tesla.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Both companies had teams of handlers that followed him around and kept him from messing with important work. Now that he's addicted to 24/7 media attention, I doubt the handlers will be able to contain him.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

I don't understand why Tesla won't remove him. He isn't even the majority stock holder. I highly doubt he adds any value for the company at this point so the only thing I can think of is that there must be some weird clause in their agreements.

I've owned a Tesla since 2017 and at this point, I've only replaced tires and spent less than $1000 on electricity to go a bit over 50k miles, but I'm ashamed to be driving it every day and it sucks.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Sounds like a win for Tesla and SpaceX employees.