this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
980 points (94.8% liked)

Atheist Memes

5483 readers
12 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Robmart@lemm.ee 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Aren't you just seeing the lack of water rather than actually seeing the oxygen?

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And what is inside the bubbles instead of water?

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

nitrogen – 78%

oxygen – 17%

carbon dioxide – 4%

other gases - 1%

[–] corship@feddit.de 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ehhh, if you made a translucent sphere that could hold a vacuum you would get the same outcome l.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It would be close but but exactly the same. A vacuum would refract the light going through it differently than a bubble of gas. Though I think it would need to be pretty big to see it with the naked eye.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

You see the a bubble of gas(and therefore the absence of water), not the oxygen itself. You could use only nitrogen gas and you couldn't tell the difference.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There won't be that much CO2 for a long time, even if we increase our carbon output. Currently it stands at around 0.04%, third to argon at a bit under 1%. Oxygen is just under 21%. Oxygen and nitrogen together make up over 99% of the atmosphere (at sea level). That's for dry air, otherwise water vapour is at around 1% and the others reduced to fit that in.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

Ah, but this is a bubble blown by a person. Exhale would have less oxygen and more CO2.

[–] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Well if we're gonna get specific then if your blowing the bubbles I would assume it's largely carbon dioxide lol

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Unless you are blowing from an oxygen tank. You don't need to use your lungs.

[–] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 months ago

You know what, fair enough lol

[–] Venat0r@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Maybe, but its a similar case with a mirror, unless its dirty or the backing is flaking off.