this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
71 points (98.6% liked)

Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

11447 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

Important

Beginning of January 1st 2024 this rule WILL be enforced. Posts that are not tagged will be warned and if not fixed within 24h then removed!

Cross-posting

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is self-hosted enough to avoid push notifications going through Apple and Google servers?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 5 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I'm not aware of a self-hosted push notification server for microG, but I'd run it if there was one.

[–] harrim4n@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How would that work? The provider / vendor of whatever app or service you are using would need to know that they need to contact that server to send a notification to your device.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Apps on android register push notifications with the Google Play Services daemon on your phone, which in turn registers them on Google Cloud Messaging. Google Play Services is the non-open source part of Android that makes Android a proprietary operating system.

MicroG is an open-source reimplementation of Google Play Services, used on Android variants like CalyxOS and Lineage OS. MicroG currently only supports registering push notifications on Google Cloud Messaging, but I would love to have an option for self-hosted push notifications.

Right now looking at my MicroG, I have 77 apps registered to use Google Cloud Messaging.

One benefit of using MicroG at least, is that Google doesn't know who owns the phone getting the push notifications. There is no Google acount or any other identifying data, the IMEI, serial number, etc is randomized and fake.

[–] harrim4n@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, the local client part is clear. But for the server part to be self hosted, the vendor would need to know how to reach you / your device.

Currently, they only go "hey, I have a message for user "Justin "! Google, can you make sure they get it?". And Google takes that message, figures out which backend server your phone is currently connected to, routes to that server, the server hands it to your phone, and then you get a nice ad about CandyCrush or whatever.

If you were to host your own server, there would be an additional layer of figuring out which backend this message needs to be routed to. And for that, every vendor would need to maintain a list of backend and which users / devices are using which. Or, a third party (Google?) would need to offer a service that does this part for the vendor.

This would technically be possible, but as far as I know is not a part of the current "standards" for push notifications.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 1 points 11 months ago

Ah, OK. I thought it was the Google side that held a connection to the app server. If the app server is sending reqs to Google Cloud then that's not really possible, yeah.

load more comments (3 replies)