552
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gork@lemm.ee 48 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is the reason I don't like materialization/dematerialization transporters. Not only do they have the risk of coordinate failure like in the meme, but also:

  1. The person on the other side isn't guaranteed to be the same person when rematerialized. There's the ontological argument that when you're dematerialized, you die as your physical form is eliminated and that the person appearing on the other side is merely a clone of you, but not you.

  2. Alien interference or environmental contamination can mess up the person on rematerialization. Even small changes can alter the delicate brain chemistry we meatbags have.

  3. Being stuck in the ship's memory buffer while it verifies an open teleporter slot can't be very fun or comfortable.

This is why I only support non-dematerializing wormhole based travel where spacetime itself opens for you to enter. Less chance of mistakes.

[-] teft@startrek.website 24 points 7 months ago

Being stuck in the ship’s memory buffer

[-] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 16 points 7 months ago
  1. Get Tuvixed because you got a bit of alien leaf stuck to your shoe.
[-] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago

Teleporter going full Bill O'Reilly:

Fuck it, we'll Merge it live!

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago

We’re gonna need a rebase -hard in here!

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

How about all those many scenes where someone grabs a transported person to make a quick last minute getaway.

So the computer was programmed and targeted for just one person but at the start of the transport sequence all of a sudden two people are now part of the transport.

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 7 months ago
  1. The person on the other side isn't guaranteed to be the same person when rematerialized. There's the ontological argument that when you're dematerialized, you die as your physical form is eliminated and that the person appearing on the other side is merely a clone of you, but not you.

Ah, the ship of ~~Theseus~~ O'Brien.

[-] negativenull@startrek.website 12 points 7 months ago
[-] brezelradar@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago

As most of the human cells die and get replaced within a few years, humans are already beings of Theseus.

[-] MjolnirThyme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

Roughly every 7 years for most of the body, major organs tend to take longer, more like 10. Your brain replaces cells at a way slower rate, you'll only Theseus your brain about 80% at best if you live a long healthy life.

[-] brezelradar@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, there is a wide spread in distribution. Some blood cells, skin epithelium and some gastric cells only live for a few days.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

That's not true at all.

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The person on the other side isn’t guaranteed to be the same person when rematerialized. There’s the ontological argument that when you’re dematerialized, you die as your physical form is eliminated and that the person appearing on the other side is merely a clone of you, but not you.

That's just all a bunch of metaphysical nonsense...

[-] reminiscensdeus@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

Big agree, do you think they'd let us into Starfleet if we refused to use transporters tho :(

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Didn't bones refuse to get on that plane?

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

That was Mr. T. Easy to confuse the two.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

The first ever Star Trek tie-in novel, Spock Must Die, dealt with the implications of the first issue you brought up when Spock is accidentally duplicated by the transporter.

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago

What about Thomas Riker?!

[-] Steve@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago

Another reason why Stargate > Star Trek

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Except the Stargate also dematerializes you. Also there's no way of guaranteeing that the gate on the other end is open and there's apparently no safety protocols to ensure that it is so you could open the gate and then step through and just die.

Oh you know it could be underwater.

Or in space.

Or around a black hole in which case you die even if you don't enter.

Really they're actually quite dangerous technology and definitely not safe.

Also sometimes they accidentally time travel you

[-] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You know what? You’re right. I still think Stargate is a superior tv show, but the transporter is safer than the stargate.

[-] JWBananas@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago

Also sometimes they accidentally time travel you

As I recall that was one of the problems with Carter's control interface. A proper DHD shouldn't have that issue.

At least that was the case until it happened again in the Pegasus galaxy. But Stargate never was great about canonical continuity.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Isn't that sacrilege on this instance? lol

[-] Australis13@fedia.io 4 points 7 months ago
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
552 points (99.1% liked)

Risa

6743 readers
138 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS